Table of Contents
Journey through the development of Nuclear atomic bomb! Christopher Nolan’s Epic Thriller Of The Father Of The Atomic Bomb Is As Frightening As It Is Brilliant. Cillian Murphy makes a comeback to Oppenheimer in the gripping tale of American scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer and his influential role in the development of the atomic bomb. Nolan has created an impressive portrayal of Oppenheimer, known as the “father of the atomic bomb.”
The film captures a profound change in awareness within a haunting three-hour drama. It portrays the life of the American physicist involved in researching and creating the atomic bombs used in World War II, which had a significant impact on shaping our current human-dominated era, but every movie has some flaws, read further to know what were the flaws we have seen in Nolan’s highly anticipated movie.
A Thrilling Journey into Guilt and Doomsday Visions
Oppenheimer is an intense three-hour biopic that feels like an exciting thriller, rarely pausing as it explores the heavy burden of guilt and envisions the main character’s inner thoughts, filled with haunting visions of doomsday that serve as a warning and criticism of humanity. It’s an overwhelming, heart-pounding, and awe-inspiring experience.
Exploring Inner Consequences of The Atomic Age
The opening scenes effectively set the tone for the entire movie, as we witness Oppenheimer’s troubled mind struggling to find peace even in the serenity of nature. The visual of raindrops in puddles, reminiscent of subatomic particles, serves as a haunting metaphor for the destructive forces at play within him. As the film progresses, the recurring imagery of Oppenheimer’s inner turmoil intensifies, especially when he confronts the profound consequences of his creation, the atomic bomb.
A Riveting Film that Commands Your Full Focus
To fully enjoy Oppenheimer, you need to stay attentive and engaged because it’s a movie that demands your full attention. The film showcases intelligent filmmaking and treats its audience with great respect.
A Captivating Ride, Yet Challenging Dialogues
Oppenheimer is a fast-paced movie where the characters speak quickly and share a lot of information. It constantly shifts to different moments in J. Robert Oppenheimer’s life throughout the three hours it runs, providing a complete and captivating depiction of the physicist’s story. However, some audience members found it energy-consuming and confusing because the dialogues were challenging to understand at once and shifting on a really fast pace.
A Pivotal Meeting with President Truman
One of the film’s crucial scenes involves the meeting between Oppenheimer and President Harry S. Truman in the White House Oval Office. Oppenheimer, expressing his guilt over the bloodshed caused by the bomb. He points out that the Japanese are more concerned about who dropped the bomb, not who made it. This scene raises an important issue while Oppenheimer’s story is fascinating, it might distract from the bigger historical context.
Psychological Thrills and Historical Chills
The movie shines brightest when it explores the psychological aspects of a well-known historical figure, turning into a psychological thriller and even briefly venturing into psychological horror. A particularly frightening speech sequence adds to the intensity. Despite the familiar historical background, the film skillfully creates suspenseful moments that keep the audience engaged.
Exhausting Direction and Deafening Sound
It creates a cinematic experience like no other! My main concern with the movie might the rapid jump cuts in the direction were jarring and made the experience tiring. Additionally, the loud music and sound felt intrusive, similar to other Nolan films like Interstellar, which I enjoyed despite the loud music.
Balancing Runtime and Enjoyment
In the last hour of the movie, I started to notice its length, and I think it would have been better if the final act was a shorter epilogue rather than a whole third of the film. Personally, I might have enjoyed Oppenheimer more if it was 2.5 hours instead of 3, but overall, it wasn’t a bad movie; just a bit testing on patience. (Note: This opinion is subjective, as I’ve seen other long movies that I found justified their runtime.)
A Stellar Cast Lights Up the Screen
Cillian Murphy gives his best-ever performance in the movie, and he’s always fantastic in his roles. His acting is so good that it’s definitely worthy of an Oscar nomination. The rest of the cast is also amazing, although Emily Blunt’s performance can sometimes feel a bit exaggerated I feel like Robert Downey Jr. shines amazingly, marking a fantastic comeback to serious acting after a decade of taking it easy.
Oppenheimer proves to be one of the most anticipated films of the year for many viewers, delivering a great experience. While it showcases exceptional filmmaking, outstanding performances, it falls short of being an adored masterpiece due to its lengthy runtime, confusing dialogues and some minor pacing issues. Nevertheless, the movie shines as a psychological thriller and historical portrayal, anchored by Cillian Murphy’s career-best performance, making him a strong contender for early awards consideration. The film’s attention to detail, mesmerizing visuals, and gripping sound design contribute to its brilliance.
Despite its flaws, Oppenheimer remains a celebration-worthy cinematic experience, leaving audiences in awe for a significant portion of its three-hour duration. While a second watch may reveal more depth, some may find the extended runtime a test of patience, but overall, it is a movie worth seeing in theaters.